Archive for the ‘Asset Protection Planning’ Category

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »

Redo Your Estate Plan Before You Remarry

Monday, August 29th, 2011 by Moore McLaughlin

If you are getting remarried, you obviously want to celebrate, but it is also important to focus on less exciting matters like redoing your estate plan. You may have created an estate plan during your first marriage, but this time it will probably be more complicated–especially if you have children from your first marriage or more assets. The following are some pointers for ensuring your interests are taken care of when you remarry:

  • Take an inventory. The first thing you and your partner should do is each take an inventory of your assets and debts and share it with the other person. Don’t forget to include life insurance policies and retirement plans in your inventories. It is important to be open and honest about money if you want to prevent bad feelings in the future.
  • Decide how you want to handle finances. Once you know what you are dealing with, then you need to decide if you want to combine (or not combine) assets when you are married. For example, if one partner is selling a house and moving in with the other partner, will he or she contribute to the cost of the house? If one partner has significant debt, you may not want to combine finances or make any joint purchases. These decisions need to be made upfront so everyone is clear on what to expect.
  • Decide what you want to happen when you die. You and your future spouse need to figure out where each of you wants your assets to go when you die. If you have children from a previous marriage, this can be a complicated discussion. There is no guarantee that if you leave your assets to your new spouse, he or she will provide for your children after you are gone. There are a number of options to ensure your children are provided for, including creating a trust for your children, making your children beneficiaries of life insurance policies, or giving your children joint ownership of property. Even if you don’t have children, there may be family heirlooms or mementos that you want to keep in your family. Again, open discussions can prevent problems in the future.
  • Consult an elder law or estate planning attorney. Even if you don’t have a lot of assets, you should consult an attorney, especially if you have children. You will definitely need to update your will. You may also need to update or create other estate planning documents such as a durable power of attorney and a health care proxy. If you have significant assets, a prenuptial agreement may be appropriate. In addition, the attorney can help you decide if a trust is necessary to protect your children’s interests.
  • Change your beneficiaries. You may want to change the beneficiaries on your life insurance policy, annuity, and/or retirement plan. If you are divorced, however, you may not be able to change some of the beneficiaries. Bring your divorce decree with you to the attorney so he or she can make sure you do not violate the decree. If you can’t change your beneficiaries, you may want to buy additional life insurance or retirement plans that will include your new spouse.
  • Consider a prenuptial agreement. While you are intending to stay married, things happen. Unlike a first marriage, you may be bringing property to this marriage that you spent decades accumulating and you may be merging two families. You need to decide together what your intentions are for the use of funds while you are living together, if you get divorced and when one of you dies before the other. Failure to think and plan ahead can mean severe heartache and financial costs for you and your family.
  • Consider purchasing long-term care insurance.The physical, emotional and financial cost of long-term care can deplete the savings of all but the most wealthy. While you may be willing to spend your lifetime of savings on the care of a spouse with whom you raised a family and accumulated the funds, you may not want to lose this to the care of a relatively new spouse. Long-term care insurance, while expensive, can permit you and your new spouse to get the care you need without impoverishing the other.

The most important thing to remember is to be open and honest with your future spouse and your family members about your wishes.

For more information on estate planning, please contact Jill E. Sugarman, Esq. at JSugarman@McLaughlinQuinn.com or by phone at 401-421-5115 ext. 215.

No Comments »

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Asset Protection Planning, Elderlaw/Law For Life, Estate Planning, Tax planning

Seven Tax Tips for Recently Married Taxpayers

Thursday, August 25th, 2011 by Moore McLaughlin
IRS Summertime Tax Tip 2011-20, August 19, 2011

With the summer wedding season in full swing, the Internal Revenue Service advises the soon-to-be married and the just married to review their changing tax status. If you recently got married or are planning a wedding, the last thing on your mind is taxes. However, there are some important steps you need to take to avoid stress at tax time. Here are seven tips for newlyweds.

  1. Notify the Social Security Administration Report any name change to the Social Security Administration so your name and Social Security number will match when you file your next tax return. File a Form SS-5, Application for a Social Security Card, at your local SSA office. The form is available on SSA’s website at www.ssa.gov, by calling 800-772-1213 or at local offices.
  2. Notify the IRS if you move If you have a new address you should notify the IRS by sending Form 8822, Change of Address. You may download Form 8822 from www.IRS.gov or order it by calling 800–TAX–FORM (800–829–3676).
  3. Notify the U.S. Postal Service You should also notify the U.S. Postal Service when you move so it can forward any IRS correspondence or refunds. 
  4. Notify your employer Report any name and address changes to your employer(s) to make sure you receive your Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement, after the end of the year. 
  5. Check your withholding If both you and your spouse work, your combined income may place you in a higher tax bracket. You can use the IRS Withholding Calculator available on www.irs.gov to assist you in determining the correct amount of withholding needed for your new filing status. The IRS Withholding Calculator will give you the information you need to complete a new Form W-4, Employee’s Withholding Allowance Certificate. You can fill it out and print it online and then give the form to your employer(s) so they withhold the correct amount from your pay.
  6. Select the right tax form Choosing the right individual income tax form can help save money. Newly married taxpayers may find that they now have enough deductions to itemize on their tax returns. Itemized deductions must be claimed on a Form 1040, not a 1040A or 1040EZ.
  7. Choose the best filing status A person’s marital status on Dec. 31 determines whether the person is considered married for that year. Generally, the tax law allows married couples to choose to file their federal income tax return either jointly or separately in any given year. Figuring the tax both ways can determine which filing status will result in the lowest tax, but usually filing jointly is more beneficial.

For more information about changing your name, address and income tax withholding visit www.irs.gov.  IRS forms and publications can be obtained from www.irs.gov or by calling 800-TAX-FORM (800-829-3676).

Links:

YouTube Video:
No Comments »

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Asset Protection Planning, Elderlaw/Law For Life, Estate Planning, Tax planning

Using IRAs in Estate Planning

Monday, August 22nd, 2011 by Moore McLaughlin

Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) are a popular investment tool for retirement, but they also need to be taken into account when doing estate planning. Although IRAs can be used to provide for heirs either directly or through a trust, to what extent your heirs will benefit from the IRA and avoid unnecessary taxes depends on proper planning.

What Is an IRA?
IRAs are personal savings plans that allow you to set aside money for retirement and create tax savings. The advantage of IRAs is that you may be able to deduct some or all of your contributions to an IRA from your taxes and also be eligible for a tax credit equal to a percentage of your contribution. Earnings in a traditional IRA are generally are not taxed until distributed to you. At age 70 1/2 you have to start taking distributions from a traditional IRA. Earnings in a Roth IRA are not taxed nor do you have to start taking distributions at any point, but contributions to a Roth IRA are not tax deductible. Any amount remaining in your IRA upon your death can be paid to your beneficiary or beneficiaries.

Rule Number One: Name Beneficiaries
From an estate planning perspective, the most important thing to remember with an IRA is to name a beneficiary. While a spouse is usually the logical choice for a beneficiary, you should be sure to name contingent beneficiaries as well. If you and your spouse died at the same time and there was no contingent beneficiary, then the IRA would go to your estate and be subject to probate (the legal process of administering the estate of a deceased person).

Stretching an IRA
If you don’t need the funds in your IRA for retirement and want to use them to provide for your beneficiaries instead, you may be interested in “stretching out” your IRA. To do this, when you reach 70 1/2, take only the required minimum distributions, leaving more assets in your IRA. When you die, your beneficiary can also stretch distributions out over his or her lifetime and then designate a second-generation beneficiary. It makes sense to name a young beneficiary because the younger the beneficiary, the smaller each distribution must be, which gives the funds in the IRA extra tax-deferred years to grow.

Trusts as Beneficiaries
In some cases, it may make sense to name a trust as a beneficiary. This is particularly true if you have minor children, children with special needs, or a beneficiary with poor spending habits. But the trust must be properly drafted to avoid negative tax consequences. If the trust is a “see-through” trust or “conduit” trust, then the distributions from the IRA to the trust after the participant’s death can be stretched out over the life expectancy of the oldest trust beneficiary. If you are planning to leave your IRA to a trust, you must consult with your attorney to ensure that the trust is properly drafted.

An IRA can be a valuable part of an estate plan, but the rules can be complicated. Consult with a qualified elder law or estate planning attorney, such as Jill E. Sugarman, Esq. to find out your options.  You may reach Attorney Sugarman at 401-421-5115 ext. 215 or by e-mail at JSugarman@McLaughlinQuinn.com.

No Comments »

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Asset Protection Planning, Elderlaw/Law For Life, Estate Planning, Self-directed IRAs, Tax planning

What a Good Long-Term Care Policy Should Include

Wednesday, August 17th, 2011 by Moore McLaughlin

As nursing home and long-term care costs continue to rise, recent legislation has made it more difficult to qualify for Medicaid to pay for nursing home costs. Long-term care insurance can help cover expenses, but long term care insurance contracts are notoriously confusing. How do you figure out what is right for you? Elderlaw attorney Jill E. Sugarman provides the following tips to help you sort through all the different options.

Find a strong insurance company. The first step is to choose a solid insurance company. Because it is likely you won’t be using the policy for many years, you want to make sure the company will still be around when you need it. Make certain that the insurer is rated in the top two categories by one of the services that rates insurance companies.

What is covered. Policies may cover nursing home care, home health care, assisted living, hospice care, or adult day care, or some combination of these. The more comprehensive the policy, the better. A policy that covers multiple types of care will give you more flexibility in choosing the care that is right for you.

Waiting period. Most long-term care insurance policies have a waiting period before benefits begin to kick in. This waiting period can be between 0 and 90 days, or even longer. You will have to cover all expenses during the waiting period, so choose a time period that you think you can afford to cover. A longer waiting period can mean lower premiums, but you need to be careful if you are getting home care. Look for a policy that bases the waiting period on calendar days. For some insurance companies, the waiting period is not based on calendar days, but on days of reimbursable service, which can be very complicated. Some policies may have different waiting periods for home health care and nursing home care, and some companies waive the waiting period for home health care altogether.

Daily benefit. The daily benefit is the amount the insurance pays per day toward long-term care expenses. If your daily benefit doesn’t cover your expenses, you will have to cover any additional costs. Purchasing the maximum daily benefit will assure you have the most coverage available. If you want to lower your premiums, you may consider covering a portion of the care yourself. You can then insure for the maximum daily benefit minus the amount you are covering. The lower daily benefit will mean a lower premium.

It is important to determine how the daily benefit is calculated. It can be each day’s actual charges (called daily reimbursement) or the daily average, calculated each month (called monthly reimbursement). The latter is better for home health care because a home care worker might come for a full day, one day, and then only part of the day, the next day.

Benefit period. When you purchase a policy, you need to choose how long you want your coverage to last. In general, you do not need to purchase a lifetime policy three to five years worth of coverage should be enough. In fact a new study from the American Association of Long-term Care Insurance shows that a three-year benefit policy is sufficient for most people. According to the study of in-force long-term care policies, only 8 percent of people needed coverage for more than three years. So, unless you have a family history of a chronic illness, you aren’t likely to need more coverage. If you are buying insurance as part of a Medicaid planning strategy, however, you will need to purchase at least enough insurance to cover the five-year lookback period. That way you can transfer assets to your children or grandchildren before you enter the nursing home, use the long-term care coverage to wait out Medicaid’s new five-year look-back period, and after those five years have passed apply for Medicaid to pay your nursing home costs (provided the assets remaining in your name do not exceed Medicaid’s limits).

If you do have a history of a chronic disease in your family, you may want to purchase more coverage. Coverage for 10 years may be enough and would still be less expensive than purchasing a lifetime policy.

Inflation protection. As nursing home costs continue to rise, your daily benefit will cover less and less of your expenses. Most insurance policies offer inflation protection of 5 percent a year, which is designed to increase your daily benefit along with the long-term care inflation rate of 5.6 percent a year. Although inflation protection can significantly increase your premium, it is strongly recommended. There are two main types of inflation protection: compound interest increases or simple interest increases. If you are purchasing a long-term care policy and are younger than age 62 or 63, you will need to purchase compound inflation protection. This can, however, more than double your premium. If you purchase a policy after age 62 or 63, some experts believe that simple inflation increases should be enough, and you will save on premium costs.

For more information on long-term care insurance, contact Jill E. Sugarman, Esq. at 401-421-5115 ext 215 or by e-mail at JSugarman@McLaughlinQuinn.com.

No Comments »

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Asset Protection Planning, Elderlaw/Law For Life, Estate Planning

Steps to Take in Advance of Death or Disability

Thursday, August 4th, 2011 by Moore McLaughlin

As elderlaw attorney Jill E. Sugarman can attest, no one wants to face the fact that our loved ones will not be with us forever. Facing our own mortality is frightening as well. Although none of us wants to contemplate a time when we or a loved one might become disabled or die, it is important to be prepared. There are many steps families can take in advance of death or disability to avoid future conflicts or uncertainties:

  • Don’t be afraid to start the conversation. Whether you are a parent talking to your children, a husband talking to a wife, or an adult child talking to an aging parent, bringing up the topic of death and disability can be difficult, but it is an important conversation to have. A study by The Hartford found that parents were more willing to discuss estate planning issues than their children.
  • Make sure you or your loved ones have done estate planning. All estate plans should include, at minimum, two important estate planning instruments: a durable power of attorney and a will. The first is for managing property during your lifetime, in case you are unable to do so yourself. The second is for the management and distribution of property after death. Revocable (or “living”) trusts can also help you avoid probate and manage your estate both during your life and after you’re gone. In addition, you or your loved ones should consult with an estate planning professional about the best way to minimize estate taxes. For more information on estate planning, contact Jill E. Sugarman, Esq. at 401-421-5115 ext. 215 or by e-mail at JSugarman@McLaughlinQuinn.com.
  • Plan for the worst. You and your loved ones need to be prepared in the event that one of you becomes disabled and will no longer be able to make your own decisions. The durable power of attorney mentioned above is an important instrument. You will also need a health care proxy (sometimes called a health care power of attorney), which gives someone else the medical authority to communicate your wishes about medical treatment. For more information on medical directives, contact Jill E. Sugarman, Esq. at 401-421-5115 ext. 215 or by e-mail at JSugarman@McLaughlinQuinn.com.
  • Make sure you or your loved ones draw up a list to help your executors carry out your estate plans. The list should contain information on the location of assets, such as bank accounts, property, and stocks and bonds; the location, keys, and passwords to any safe deposit boxes; the identity of important professionals who might have information about your estate; and the location of important records, such as loan, insurance, and tax documents. The list can also contain things you want done immediately after you die, such as calling relatives or notifying employers.
  • Determine you or your loved ones’ wishes regarding funeral arrangements. You may want to pay for your funeral ahead of time to take the burden off of family, but you need to be careful and shop around. Contact Jill E. Sugarman, Esq. at 401-421-5115 ext. 215 or by e-mail at JSugarman@McLaughlinQuinn.com for information and tips on making advance funeral arrangements. If you can’t make arrangements ahead of time, put your wishes in writing so the whole family knows what you want.
  • Figure out who is going to get what personal property and heirlooms. Preparation and planning in advance can avoid family squabbles after you or your loved ones die. For more information contact Jill E. Sugarman, Esq. at 401-421-5115 ext. 215 or by e-mail at JSugarman@McLaughlinQuinn.com.
No Comments »

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Asset Protection Planning, Elderlaw/Law For Life, Estate Planning

10 Steps to Less Stressful Caretaking

Monday, August 1st, 2011 by Moore McLaughlin

Taking care of an elderly loved one, whether due to dementia or illness, can be exhausting and stressful. Often due to the lack of outside help, a devotion to the person needing care, or the tunnel vision that can accompany exhaustion, caretakers don’t take care of themselves.

But they must. Failure to do so can lead to burnout, injury or illness. If you are the caregiver, any of these results will harm your ability to care for your loved one.

Here are some ways to take care of yourself and make sure you can take care of your loved one. The list is adapted from New York Times columnist Jane Brody’s excellent Nov. 17, 2008, column, “Caring for Family, Caring for Yourself.”

  1. Take a break every day. Make sure you have some down time to relax, whether it’s watching television, reading the newspaper, or calling a friend. Make sure you do at least one thing for yourself every day.
  2. Take a break every week. If possible, get out of the house at least once a week to do something you want to do — go to the movies, have dinner with friends, whatever works for you. If you cannot get someone to cover for you, have friends over to your house.
  3. Get respite. Take a break of at least a week at least once a year. You can hire help in the house or arrange for a respite stay at an assisted living facility or nursing home.
  4. Get regular exercise. It’s necessary for your health and to moderate any stress you may be feeling. If you can’t get out of the house to exercise, buy or rent a stationary bicycle or other exercise equipment.
  5. Eat well. Make sure you stay healthy and have sufficient energy to do what you need to for your loved one.
  6. Get enough sleep. Lack of sleep will sap your patience and reserves, making it more difficult for you to provide the care you would like to give your loved one.
  7. Join a support group. While you may or may not be in this alone, you’re not the only one in this situation. Others are going through similar experiences. Here are sources for finding support groups: the National Family Caregivers Association (www.nfcacares.org) and its Community Action Network (www.thefamilycaregiver.org), and the Family Caregiver Alliance and its online support group (www.caregiver.org).
  8. Hire a geriatric care manager. An experienced geriatric care manager can help you determine whether your loved one is receiving the most appropriate care and what resources in the community are available to assist you. For more on geriatric care managers, click here.
  9. Consult with an elder law attorney. In order to access many of the programs recommended by the geriatric care manager, your loved one will have to qualify financially. An elder law attorney can help you qualify for these benefits. In addition, make sure you don’t get hit with a double financial whammy of losing years of earnings while you’re caring for your family member and losing his or her assets due to squabbles with other family members or Medicaid estate recovery. Also, you may be entitled to some pay by the state for the care you are providing. To speak with a qualified elder law attorney, contact Jill E. Sugarman, Esq. at 401-421-5115 ext 217 or by e-mail at JSugarman@McLaughlinQuinn.com.
  10. Lotsa Helping Hands. Check out www.lotsahelpinghands.com as a resource for getting volunteer help in your community and coordinating the help your family and friends already provide.In short, think of the care you are providing as a marathon, not a sprint. You need to pace yourself and conserve your energy for the long-term. Too much stress and exhaustion won’t help your loved one.

In short, think of the care you are providing as a marathon, not a sprint. You need to pace yourself and conserve your energy for the long-term. Too much stress and exhaustion won’t help your loved one.

No Comments »

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Asset Protection Planning, Elderlaw/Law For Life, Estate Planning

Two Tax Court Decisions Clarify When Long-Term Care Expenses Are Deductible

Thursday, July 28th, 2011 by Moore McLaughlin

Long-term care can be very expensive, but many long-term care expenses can be deducted from your taxes. Two important recent decisions by the U.S. Tax Court provide guidance on when caregiving services are deductible. In one decision, the court ruled that payments to non-medical caregivers are still deductible as medical expenses; in the other, the court held that a written agreement is required in order for a deceased woman’s estate to deduct more than $1 million in care that her son allegedly provided her.

In the first case, Estate of Lillian Baral v. Commissioner, Lillian Baral suffered from dementia and her doctor recommended that she get 24-hour-a-day care. Her brother hired caregivers to assist Ms. Baral with daily activities. On her tax return, Ms. Baral included a deduction for medical expenses for the payments to the caregivers. The IRS said the expenses were not deductible and asked for more money. Following Ms. Baral’s death, her estate appealed the matter to the U.S. Tax Court.

Under tax law, expenses for medical care may be claimed as an itemized deduction if they exceed 7.5 percent of adjusted gross income. (Note that this threshold will rise to 10 percent of adjusted gross income in 2012.) The definition of medical expenses includes the cost of long-term care if a doctor has determined you are chronically ill. “Chronically ill” means you need help with activities like eating, going to the bathroom, bathing, and dressing, or you require substantial supervision due to a severe cognitive impairment.

The Tax Court agreed with Ms. Baral that the payments to the caregivers for assisting and supervising Ms. Baral are deductible medical expenses. The expenses qualified as long-term care services even though the caregivers were not medical personnel because a doctor had found that the services provided to Ms. Baral were necessary due to her dementia.

In the second case, Estate of Olivio v. Commissioner, New Jersey resident Anthony Olivo provided nearly full-time care to his mother from 1994 to 2003, during which time he largely abandoned his practice as an attorney. After his mother died, Mr. Olivo became administrator of her estate.

Mr. Olivo filed a tax return for the estate and claimed a deduction of $1.24 million as a debt he said the estate owed him for the care he had provided his mother over the years. He claimed he had an oral agreement with his mother that after she died she would compensate him for his services. The IRS disallowed the deduction and Mr. Olivo filed a petition with the Tax Court.

The U.S. Tax Court agreed with the IRS that the estate is not entitled to the deduction. Applying the law in New Jersey, which presumes that services to a family member living in the same household are given for free (many states have similar laws), the court ruled that without a written agreement between Ms. Olivo and her son, it must assume that Mr. Olivo provided the services without any expectation he would be repaid.

Check with your CPA to determine if your long-term care expenses are deductible.

No Comments »

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Asset Protection Planning, Elderlaw/Law For Life, Estate Planning, IRS and state tax collections, Tax Current Events and News, Tax planning

Proposals to reform or eliminate the mortgage interest deduction

Thursday, July 21st, 2011 by Moore McLaughlin

As lawmakers continue to debate how to handle the nation’s debt and do “something big” rather than simply patch the problem, it seems probable that many broader tax reform issues may resurface during the course of the negotiations. One such issue, which was addressed by President Obama in his 2012 and 2011 budget proposals, is the mortgage interest deduction—one of the largest tax expenditures. According to various estimates, the deduction cost the Treasury Department somewhere between $80 and $103 billion in 2010, and its value over the 10-year budget window is expected to exceed $1 trillion. This post examines the mechanics of the deduction, arguments for and against reforming it, reform proposals, and the projected effect of any changes on both taxpayers and the budget.

Background. Interest paid with respect to a mortgage on real estate is deductible interest on indebtedness. Itemizing taxpayers can deduct their mortgage interest on up to $1 million of qualifying acquisition debt on a qualified principal and, if applicable, secondary residence. A residence includes a house, condominium, cooperative, mobile home, house trailer, or boat. In effect, this deduction reduces the after-tax cost of financing a home. In contrast, taxpayers are not permitted to deduct the costs of renting a home.

Itemizing taxpayers can also deduct interest on up to $100,000 ($50,000 for married individuals filing separately) of home equity debt—i.e., debt secured by a taxpayer’s qualified residence up to the fair market value of the residence, as reduced by the amount of acquisition indebtedness on it.

Arguments for and against reforming the deduction. The mortgage interest deduction is often criticized as being an “upside-down” subsidy, in that it tends to provide greater benefit to taxpayers with higher incomes. The amount of interest paid by lower- and moderate-income taxpayers is less likely to be sufficiently high to make it worthwhile to forego the standard deduction, so they are less likely to claim any benefit from it.

Proponents of the deduction argue that it encourages home ownership and makes it affordable to taxpayers who would otherwise not be able to own a home. Critics claim in response that, rather than encouraging home ownership, the deduction actually encourages middle-class and wealthy taxpayers to take on more debt and buy larger homes than they otherwise would. Further, critics argue that the deduction tends to benefit taxpayers with larger incomes who likely would have purchased a home regardless of the deduction.

M&Q illustration : A married couple who takes out a $150,000 mortgage on January 1, 2011, payable over 30 years with 7% interest, pays $9,584.85 in interest in the first year. Unless the couple has other itemized deductions, they may simply opt for the $11,400 standard deduction.

If the same couple were to double their mortgage to $300,000, same interest and term, their interest payment in the first year is $19,169.71.

If the couple were to again double their mortgage to $600,000, the interest payment would be $38,339.42.

Critics of the deduction also claim that the deduction artificially drives up home prices. However, this same argument is cited by its proponents, who observe that eliminating the deduction could further impact home prices in an already depressed market.

M&Q observation: The effect of driving up prices may have contributed to the problem of “underwater” mortgages, where taxpayers owe more on their homes than the home is actually worth.

Proposals. A number of different proposals have been advanced regarding the mortgage interest deduction. In light of the popularity of the provision, and the strength of the real estate lobby, it appears unlikely that it would be repealed outright. In general, the proposals tend to focus on converting the deduction to a credit, capping the maximum mortgage amount, and limiting the credit to a primary residence.

The President’s Fiscal Commission proposed a 12% nonrefundable credit on up to a $500,000 mortgage, with no credit for a second residence or for home equity. The Debt Reduction Task Force would have a 15% refundable tax credit capped at $25,000. Other proposals suggest a 20% credit, whereas another proposal is to simply have a fixed credit for owning a home as opposed to having a mortgage.

President Obama’s 2012 budget proposal, as well as his 2011 proposal, suggested capping itemized deductions, including mortgage interest, for taxpayers in the top two tax brackets (33% and 35%). Under the proposal, these taxpayers would only be able to reduce their tax liability by a maximum of 28%.

M&Q illustration : The current structure of the mortgage interest deduction reduces the after-tax cost for each $100 borrowed by a taxpayer in the 35% bracket to $65. However, the after-tax cost for each $100 borrowed by a taxpayer in the 10% bracket is $90. In other words, the higher a taxpayer’s tax bracket, the greater relative benefit he will receive from the deduction. The Administration’s proposal would limit the benefit to higher-income taxpayers by five or seven percentage points, such that the after-tax cost for each $100 borrowed would rise to $72.

M&Q observation: The effect of this proposal on taxpayers who are subject to the alternative minimum tax (AMT) would depend on a number of factors, including the taxpayer’s particular mix of income and deductions and the taxpayer’s marginal statutory rate. Although AMT taxpayers are already effectively subject to a 28% limit on deductions, the President’s proposal has an AMT element that would nonetheless result in an increase in the tentative minimum tax liability of certain AMT taxpayers.

Economic effect. Given the amount of foregone revenue from the deduction, the effects of reforming or repealing the provision could be significant.

If the deduction was repealed flat out, the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center (TPC) estimates that the average tax bill of those who claim the mortgage interest deduction would increase by $710. However, this increase would vary widely among taxpayers—those with $30,000 to $40,000 incomes would face an average increase of $70, whereas taxpayers making over $1 million would face an average increase of $4,000. However, given the popularity of the deduction, its outright repeal seems unlikely.

According to the TPC, replacing the current mortgage interest deduction with a 20% nonrefundable credit, limiting mortgages eligible for the credit to $500,000, and limiting the credit to primary residences would only have a nominal or positive effect on the majority of the tax bills of those who claim the deduction. Again, those who would face the largest increase are taxpayers in the top tax brackets with the largest mortgages.

The economic effect of replacing the deduction with a flat credit for home owners, regardless of whether their home debt-financed, would obviously depend on the amount of the credit. In general, credits are considered more progressive than deductions, and the benefit of a flat credit to higher-income taxpayers would presumably be less than that under the current regime. However, the incentive towards home ownership would remain intact.

The Joint Committee on Taxation estimates that President Obama’s proposal to limit upper-income taxpayers’ itemized deductions to 28% would yield $293,261 million over the 2011 through 2021 period.  This increased revenue would be largely attributable to the limits on mortgage interest and charitable contribution deductions.

Conclusion. While it seems unlikely that the deduction will be repealed outright, it is nonetheless possible that this popular tax expenditure could be somehow reformed or curtailed. The context of the looming debt crisis may well provide the necessary push for lawmakers to take action on this issue. What choices will be made and when remains to be seen—stay tuned.

No Comments »

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Asset Protection Planning, Tax Current Events and News, Tax planning

Rhode Island Budget Bill Expands Sales Tax Base, Imposes Various Filing Fees Among Other Changes

Wednesday, July 6th, 2011 by Moore McLaughlin

On June 30, 2011, Rhode Island Governor Lincoln Chafee signed the budget for fiscal year 2012. The budget bill broadens the sales tax base, lowers the sales tax rate to 6.5% if a change in federal law requires all remote sellers to collect and remit sales tax, and limits certain sales tax incentives. In addition, the budget bill requires corporations to file a pro forma Rhode Island corporate income tax return as if the state had adopted combined reporting for two successive years starting with the 2011 tax year, and requires recipients of certain tax incentives to comply with new or expanded reporting, accountability and transparency requirements. Further, limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are subject to an annual charge and the annual charge for limited liability companies (LLCs) is modified. Further the legislation provides for lottery winnings offset, estate filing fees, letter of good standing fees, and a surcharge on compassion centers.

Income taxes. Combined reporting study: As part of its tax return for a taxable year beginning after December 31, 2010 but before January 1, 2013, each corporation which is part of a unitary business must file a report, in a manner prescribed by the Tax Administrator, for the combined group containing the combined net income of the combined group. The use of a combined report does not disregard the separate identities for the members of the combined group. The combined report must include, at minimum, for each taxable year the following: the difference in tax owed as a result of filing a combined report compared to the tax owed under the current filing requirement; the difference in tax owed as a result of using the single sale factor apportionment method as compared to the tax owed using the current 3-factor apportionment method; volume of sales in the state and worldwide; and taxable income in the state and worldwide. Any corporation that fails to file a timely report or files a false report will be assessed a penalty not exceeding $10,000. The penalty may be waived for good cause shown for failure to timely file. Based on the information provided in the income tax returns and the data submitted, the Tax Administrator must submit a report on or before March 15, 2014, to the chairpersons of the house finance committee and senate finance committee, and the house fiscal advisor and the senate fiscal advisor analyzing the policy and fiscal ramifications of changing the business corporation tax statute to a combined method of reporting.

Taxpayer accountability: On or before September 1, 2011, and every September 1 thereafter, the project lessee of the following tax incentives must file an annual report with the Tax Administrator containing the name, Social Security number, date of hire, and hourly wage of each full-time equivalent, part-time or seasonal employee: project status through the Rhode Island Economic Development Corporation; the incentives for innovation and growth credit; enterprise zone tax credits; and motion picture production tax credits.

Lottery setoff for unpaid taxes: Effective June 30, 2011, if a taxpayer wins a lottery prize valued at more than $600 and is delinquent on state taxes owed to the Tax Administrator, the Lottery Director is authorized to setoff against the amount due to that person, after state and federal tax withholding, an amount up to the balance of the unpaid taxes owed. The Lottery Director will make payment of such amount directly to the Tax Administrator. Offsets are made based on a schedule of priorities.

Letter of good standing fee. Effective June 30, 2011, the fee for obtaining a letter of good standing from the Division of Taxation is increased from $25 to $50.

LLC annual charge. Effective June 30, 2011, any LLC that is not taxed as a corporation for federal tax purposes must pay a fee equal to the corporate minimum tax, which is currently $500; and the due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the fiscal year. Previously, a LLC that was not treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes had to pay a fee equal to the corporate minimum tax.

LLP annual charge. For tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2012, LLPs must pay an annual charge equal to the corporate minimum tax, which is currently $500. The charge is due upon the filing of the LLP’s return: on or before the April 15 for calendar year filers or the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the fiscal year for fiscal year filers. If the annual charge is not paid by the due date, a delinquency charge of $100 is added to the annual charge.

Sales tax. Rate and base: If federal law is enacted that requires remote sellers to collect and remit taxes, the sales tax rate is decreased from 7% to 6.5%, the 1% local meals and beverage tax would increase to 1.5%, and the 1% local hotel tax would increase to 1.5%. Such rate changes would be effective the first day of the first state fiscal quarter following the change. In addition, effective October 1, 2011, the 7% sales and use tax is broadened to include the following: nonprescription drugs, also known as over-the-counter drugs; prewritten computer software delivered electronically or by “load and leave,” including applications for smartphones and similar devices; furnishing package tour and scenic and sightseeing transportation services as set forth in the 2007 North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes 56120 and 487; and marijuana for medical use.

Rhode Island Economic Development Corporation: The sales tax exemption applicable to firms that use bond financing programs offered through the Rhode Island Economic Development Corporation or which are given project status by the Rhode Island Economic Development Corporation will no longer be allowed after June 30, 2011. The incentives will only apply to projects approved before July 1, 2011.

Rhode Island Industrial Facilities Corporation. Sales tax incentives related to projects involving the Rhode Island Industrial Facilities Corporation will no longer be allowed after June 30, 2011. The incentives will only apply to projects approved prior to July 1, 2011.

Hospital licensing fee. Applicable to hospitals that are duly licensed on July 1, 2011, the amount of the hospital licensing fee imposed on the net patient services revenue of every hospital for the hospital’s first fiscal year ending on or after January 1, 2010 is 5.43%. Every hospital must file a return and pay the licensing fee by electronic transfer to the Tax Administrator on or before July 16, 2012. Each hospital must file a return with the Tax Administrator on or before June 18, 2012, containing the correct computation of net patient services revenue for the hospital fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and the licensing fee due on that amount.

Compassion Center Surcharge. Effective June 30, 2011, a 4% monthly surcharge is imposed on the net patient revenue received each month by every compassion center. Each center must file a return to the Tax Administrator and make payment by electronic transfer to the General Treasurer no later than the 20th day of the month following the month that the net patient revenue was received. Such surcharge is in addition to any other authorized fees that have been assessed on a compassion center. A “compassion center” means a registered not-for-profit entity that acquires, possesses, cultivates, manufactures, delivers, transfers, transports, supplies, or dispenses marijuana, or related supplies and educational materials, to registered qualifying patients and their registered primary caregivers who have designated it as one of their primary caregivers.

Estate tax filing fees. Effective June 30, 2011, the estate filing fee is increased from $25 to $50. The filing fee applies to the statement that executors, administrators and heirs-at-law must file with the Tax Administrator within nine months of a decedent’s death showing the value of the decedent’s estate and certain other items.

No Comments »

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Asset Protection Planning, Elderlaw/Law For Life, Estate Planning, IRS and state tax collections, Tax Current Events and News, Tax planning

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »