Posts Tagged ‘assisted living facilities’
Thursday, May 24th, 2012 by Moore McLaughlin
More and more seniors are living together without getting married. According to U.S. Census data, the number of cohabiting seniors nearly doubled between 1989 and 2000. For some seniors, marriage isn’t financially worth it‚ they don’t want to lose their former spouses’ military, pension, or Social Security benefits. Other seniors don’t want to have to pay their partners’ medical expenses or deal with the objections of children worried about their inheritance.
There are risks to cohabiting without marriage, however. You have no rights with regard to your partner’s health care decisions. In addition, you may be considered “common law” married by a court after you die, possibly causing a dispute between your partner and your children. If you and your partner plan to live together without getting married, you can take a number of steps to ensure that you are protected and your wishes are followed.
- Sign a cohabitation agreement. If you live in a state that recognizes common law marriage or even if you don’t (some courts have recognized the rights of unmarried partners who lived together in non-common law states), you may want to enter into a cohabitation agreement with your partner. The agreement can state your intentions not to marry or to make any claims against each other. It can also specify the division of household expenses and what will happen to your house in the case of death or breakup. You should consult a lawyer for assistance in drawing up an agreement.
- Provide access to health care decision making. If you are not married, you have no right to participate in your partner’s health care decisions or even, in some circumstances, to visit your partner at the hospital. To avoid this situation, you need several documents. You can sign a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) medical release to allow each other access to the other’s medical information. In addition, you should have a health care proxy and/or a durable power of attorney for health care, naming your partner as your agent to make health care decisions.
- Sign a durable power of attorney. A power of attorney allows your partner, or whomever you appoint, to make financial decisions for you if you become incapacitated. Without a power of attorney, the court will have to appoint a conservator or guardian to make those decisions and the judge may not choose the person you would prefer.
- Update your will. Your will should be clear about what happens to your possessions when you die, including your house and its contents. It is particularly important to specify what will happen to your house if it is owned by only one partner.
- Think about the tax consequences of gifts. Married couples can leave each other as much as they want without paying estate taxes; unmarried couples cannot. If you want to leave money to your partner, consult an estate planning attorney or tax expert to find ways to limit estate taxes. For more on estate planning, contact Jill E. Sugarman, Esq. at JSugarman@McLaughlinQuinn.com.
Look into registering as domestic partners. Some cities and states have domestic partnership laws, which may allow unmarried couples to take advantage of their partners’ health insurance or to participate in health care decisions.
Tags: asset protection, Asset Protection Planning, assisted living facilities, cohabitation agreement, durable power of attorney, elder law, elderlaw, Elderlaw/Law For Life, Estate Planning, income tax, Jill E. Sugarman, Jill Sugarman, Long-term care, long-term care insurance, mclaughlin & quinn, Medicaid, Medicaid planning, power of attorney, Providence, Rhode Island, seniors, social security, veterans
Posted in Asset Protection Planning, Elderlaw/Law For Life, Estate Planning, Tax planning
Tuesday, May 15th, 2012 by Moore McLaughlin
Private fee-for-service (PFFS) plans are a way to give private insurance companies access to the vast Medicare market and are part of an effort to further privatize Medicare. PFFS plans are the fastest-growing Medicare Advantage plans on the market. While the additional benefits these plans often offer may look attractive, Medicare beneficiaries should look carefully before they leap into one.
In a PFFS, Medicare pays a set amount each month to a private insurer to provide health coverage on a fee-for-service basis to Medicare beneficiaries. Unlike a health maintenance organization (HMO) or preferred provider organization (PPO), PFFS members can choose from any Medicare-approved provider as long as the provider is willing to accept the plan’s payment terms. PFFS plans differ from original Medicare in that there is no limit to the premiums or co-payments a PFFS can charge. PFFS plans may offer additional benefits, such as vision or dental, but members may have to share some of the costs with Medicare. PFFS plans may let providers charge up to 15 percent above the plan’s payment amount for services.
Although the additional benefits offered through a PFFS plan may seem advantageous, a report by the Medicare Rights Center finds that private Medicare plans actually offer many disadvantages compared to original Medicare. For example, care can be more expensive because co-payments may be higher. In addition, it may be more difficult to find a doctor who will accept the plan’s payment terms. PFFS plans have also come under scrutiny for their aggressive marketing practices. Sales agents have been accused of fraud for signing up seniors who were not aware how PFFS plans differed from original Medicare.
Before you enroll in a PFFS plan, look closely at the monthly premium, co-payments, and the cost of extra benefits to make sure that this is a plan you can afford. You can call 1-800-MEDICARE or go to www.medicare.gov to compare plans.
Prescription drug coverage
Some PFFS plans offer prescription drug coverage. If the plan you choose has drug coverage, you must use the coverage offered by that plan. You may not enroll in a separate drug plan. If your PFFS plan does not offer prescription drug coverage, you can either switch to another plan that has drug coverage or add this coverage separately.
Switching plans
You can only switch to a different PFFS plans or back to original Medicare at certain times of the year. You can switch during the election period from November 15-December 31 or during the open enrollment period from January 1-March 31 of each year. Note that if you are switching from a PFFS plan with drug coverage to one without, the only time you can add drug coverage is during the election period from November 15-December 31.
For more information on how PFFS plans work, click here.
Tags: asset protection, Asset Protection Planning, assisted living facilities, elder law, elderlaw, Elderlaw/Law For Life, Estate Planning, health maintenance organization, Jill E. Sugarman, Jill Sugarman, Long-term care, long-term care insurance, Massachusetts, mclaughlin & quinn, Medicaid, Medicaid planning, Medicare, Medicare Advantage, nurses, nursing homes, PFFS, Private fee-for-service, Providence, Rhode Island, seniors, social security
Posted in Asset Protection Planning, Elderlaw/Law For Life, Estate Planning
Wednesday, May 2nd, 2012 by Moore McLaughlin
If you are caring for your mother or father, you may be able to claim your parent as a dependent on your income taxes. This would allow you to get an exemption ($3700 in 2011) for him or her.
There are five tests to determine whether you can claim a parent as a dependent:
- The person you are claiming as a dependent must be related to you. This shouldn’t be a problem if you are claiming a parent (in-laws are also allowed). Keep in mind, however, that foster parents do not count as a relative. To claim a foster parent, he or she must live with you for a year as a member of your household.
- Your parent must be a citizen or resident of the United States or a resident of Canada or Mexico.
- Your parent must not file a joint return. If your parent is married, he or she must file separately. There is an exception if your parent is filing jointly, but has no tax liability. If your parent files a joint tax return solely to get a refund, you can claim him or her as a dependent.
- Your parent must not have a gross income of $3,700 (in 2011) a year or more. Gross income does not include Social Security payments or other tax-exempt income. (For those with incomes above $25,000, some portion of Social Security income may be includable in gross income.)
- You must provide more than half of the support for your parent during the year. Support includes amounts spent to provide food, lodging, clothing, education, medical and dental care, recreation, transportation, and similar necessities. Even if you do not pay more than half your parent’s total support for the year, you may still be able to claim your parent as a dependent if you pay more than 10 percent of your parent’s support for the year, and, with others, collectively contribute to more than half of your parent’s support. To receive the exemption, all those supporting your parent must agree on and sign the applicable Multiple Support Declaration (Form 2021).
If you cannot claim your parent as a dependent because he or she filed a joint tax return or has a gross income above $3,700 (in 2011) but you have been paying your parent’s medical expenses, you may be able to deduct those expenses from your taxes. For more information on this, contact your CPA or one of the tax attorneys at McLaughlin & Quinn, LLC.
Tags: asset protection, Asset Protection Planning, assisted living facilities, dependent, elder law, elderlaw, Elderlaw/Law For Life, Estate Planning, exemption, income tax, income taxes, internal revenue code, Internal Revenue Service, IRS, IRS and state tax collections, Jill E. Sugarman, Jill Sugarman, Long-term care, long-term care insurance, mclaughlin & quinn, Medicaid, Medicaid planning, Moore McLaughlin, Multiple Support Declaration, nursing homes, parent, Providence, Rhode Island, seniors, tax, Tax planning
Posted in Asset Protection Planning, Elderlaw/Law For Life, Estate Planning, Tax planning
Friday, March 9th, 2012 by Moore McLaughlin
Is having an out-of-date will better than having no will at all? While wills do not have expiration dates, certain changes can render them useless. When this happens, having an out-of-date will can be the same as having no will at all. It is important to review your will periodically to ensure it still does what you want. The following are five ways your will can become out-of-date:
- Your beneficiaries have died. What happens if your will leaves your estate to your two siblings, but both siblings die before you? If your beneficiaries predecease you, your will is still technically valid, but it will have no effect on who will inherit from your estate. Instead, your estate will be distributed according to the law in your state, just as if you had died with no will at all.
- You have potential new beneficiaries. A will that was written before you got married or had children will be of little assistance in distributing your estate. States have provisions that protect spouses and children that come after a will is written. In most states, spouses are entitled to a certain percentage of an estate. In addition, many states have laws that protect children born after a will was written, allowing them to inherit from the estate. It’s possible that under the laws of your state, a spouse and children not named in your will may not receive as much as you would have wanted them to. In both of these circumstances, state law is dictating where your estate is going, not you.
- Your executor is dead or unable to serve. The executor (also called a personal representative) is the person named in your will who oversees the distribution of your property. If the person you named as executor is unable to serve, the court will have to appoint someone else. Beneficiaries may have a say in who is chosen, but it may not be someone you would have wanted in the position.
- You no longer own property named in the will. Suppose your will attempts to divide up your estate equally by giving cash to your daughter and property of equal value to your son. If the property is sold before you die, your son will receive nothing. In this case, your will is no longer ensuring your estate is divided equally.
- The law changes. If your estate plan was designed specifically to avoid estate taxes and the estate tax law changes, your will may no longer serve its purpose.
Contact elderlaw attorney Jill E. Sugarman at 401-421-5115 or by e-mail at JSugarman@McLaughlinQuinn.com to ensure your will is still up to date or if you have no will at all.
Tags: asset protection, Asset Protection Planning, assisted living facilities, elder law, elderlaw, estate, Estate Planning, Estate tax, Jill E. Sugarman, Jill Sugarman, living will, Long-term care, long-term care insurance, mclaughlin & quinn, Medicaid, Medicaid planning, nursing homes, Providence, Rhode Island, seniors, will, wills
Posted in Asset Protection Planning, Elderlaw/Law For Life, Estate Planning, Tax planning
Monday, February 13th, 2012 by Moore McLaughlin
Americans are living longer than they did in years past, including those with disabilities. Planning by parents can make all the difference in the life of a child with a disability, as well as that of his or her siblings who may be left with the responsibility for caretaking (on top of their own careers and caring for their own families).
Supplemental needs trusts (also known as “special needs” trusts) are an important component of planning for a disabled child (even though the child may be an adult by the time the trust is created or funded). These trusts allow a disabled beneficiary to receive inheritances, gifts, lawsuit settlements, or other funds and yet not lose her eligibility for certain government programs. The trusts are drafted so that the funds will not be considered to belong to the beneficiary in determining her eligibility for public benefits.
As their name implies, supplemental needs trusts are designed not to provide basic support, but instead to pay for comforts and luxuries that could not be paid for by public assistance funds. These trusts typically pay for things like education, recreation, counseling, and medical attention beyond the simple necessities of life.
For more on supplemental needs trusts, including the different kinds of trusts available, contact Jill E. Sugarman, Esq at 401-421-5115 or by e-mail at JSugarman@McLaughlinQuinn.com.
Tags: asset protection, Asset Protection Planning, assisted living facilities, disabilities, disability, disabled beneficiary, elder law, elderlaw, Elderlaw/Law For Life, Estate Planning, Jill E. Sugarman, Jill Sugarman, Long-term care, long-term care insurance, mclaughlin & quinn, Medicaid, Medicaid planning, nurses, nursing homes, Providence, Rhode Island, seniors, social security, special needs, special needs trust, supplemental needs trust
Posted in Asset Protection Planning, Elderlaw/Law For Life, Estate Planning
Friday, December 9th, 2011 by Moore McLaughlin
Social Security doesn’t just pay retirement benefits to retired workers; in some circumstances, it also provides benefits to a worker’s spouse or ex-spouse and to a deceased worker’s surviving spouse. Here are the ins and outs of spouse and survivor benefits.
Spousal Benefits
Spouses are entitled to benefits if the marriage lasted at least 10 years. A spouse is entitled to an amount equal to one-half of the worker’s full retirement benefit. To receive this benefit, you must be at your full retirement age or caring for a child who is under 16 years old. In addition, your spouse must have filed for Social Security retirement benefits even if he or she isn’t receiving them.
If you could receive more from Social Security based on your own earnings record than through the spousal benefit, the Social Security Administration will automatically provide you with the larger benefit. If you have reached your full retirement age, you may also elect to receive spousal benefits and delay taking your benefits, allowing your own delayed retirement credits to accrue, and switch to your own benefit at a later date. However, you cannot elect to receive spousal benefits below your retirement age and later switch to your own benefits.
If you begin collecting your spousal benefit before your full retirement age, your spousal benefit will be permanently reduced. But if your spouse retires early, but you wait until your full retirement age, you will still receive benefits based on one-half of his or her full retirement benefit.
For more from the Social Security Administration on spousal benefits, click here.
Divorced spouses
An ex-spouse is also entitled to receive one half of the worker’s full retirement benefit as long as the marriage lasted at least 10 years. Unlike a current spouse, a divorced spouse can begin receiving benefits even before the worker has applied for benefits. The worker must be at least 62 years old and the divorce must have been final for at least two years.
For more from the Social Security Administration on qualifying for divorced spouse benefits, click here.
Survivor Benefits
If you are a surviving spouse at full retirement age, you are entitled to the worker’s full retirement benefits. If the worker delayed retirement, the survivor’s benefit will be higher. Survivors are entitled to benefits even if they are divorced as long as they had been married for at least 10 years. If you file for benefits before you are over age 60, but below full retirement age, you will receive a reduced percentage of the worker’s benefits. Surviving spouses who are younger than 60 receive benefits only in limited circumstances, such as cases of disability or caring for a disabled child.
For more from the Social Security Administration on the requirements for survivor benefits, click here.
Tags: asset protection, Asset Protection Planning, assisted living facilities, elder law, elderlaw, Elderlaw/Law For Life, Estate Planning, Jill E. Sugarman, Jill Sugarman, Long-term care, long-term care insurance, mclaughlin & quinn, Medicaid, Medicaid planning, Providence, Rhode Island, seniors, social security, Social Security Administration, spousal benefits, veterans
Posted in Asset Protection Planning, Elderlaw/Law For Life, Estate Planning
Thursday, October 27th, 2011 by Moore McLaughlin
Being a trustee is a big responsibility and if you don’t perform your duties properly, you could be personally liable. That’s why it’s important to hire the right people to guide you in this important role.
A trust is a legal arrangement through which one person (or an institution, such as a bank or law firm), called a “trustee,” holds legal title to property for another person, called a “beneficiary.” If you have been appointed the trustee of a trust, this is a strong vote of confidence in your judgment.
A trustee’s duties include locating and protecting trust assets, investing assets prudently, distributing assets to beneficiaries, keeping track of income and expenditures, and filing taxes. (For more information on a trustee’s duties, contact estate planning attorney Jill E. Sugarman) As a trustee, you have a fiduciary duty to the beneficiaries of the trust, meaning that you have an obligation to act in the best interest of the beneficiaries at all times. It also means you will be held to a higher standard than if you were just dealing with your own finances.
A trustee is usually entitled to hire an attorney (and other professionals like an accountant) to assist in trust administration. The attorney’s fees will be paid from the trust funds. While hiring an attorney will cost money, not having an attorney at all could cost a trustee much more if errors are made.
A trust can be administered without court involvement, but that doesn’t mean that the administration is simple. There are many areas where problems can arise — for example, if assets aren’t invested properly, taxes are late, or if proper records aren’t kept. If something goes wrong during the administration of the trust, the trustee can be removed and held personally liable for any costs incurred or losses suffered. Even if a spouse is the trustee, he or she should still consult with an attorney. Many couples have so-called “AB” trusts to take advantage of the maximum estate tax exemption; these trusts require special knowledge to determine whether the trusts are properly funded and the taxes filed.
For more information about trusts, contact estate planning attorney Jill E. Sugarman, at JSugarman@McLaughlinQuinn.com or by phone at 401-421-5115 ext. 215.
Tags: asset protection, Asset Protection Planning, assisted living facilities, beneficiary, elder law, elderlaw, Elderlaw/Law For Life, Estate Planning, fiduciary, fiduciary duties, fiduciary duty, Jill E. Sugarman, Jill Sugarman, Long-term care, long-term care insurance, mclaughlin & quinn, Medicaid, Medicaid planning, Moore McLaughlin, nursing homes, Providence, Rhode Island, seniors, Tax planning, trust, trustee, veterans
Posted in Asset Protection Planning, Elderlaw/Law For Life, Estate Planning, Tax planning
Tuesday, October 11th, 2011 by Moore McLaughlin
A new study finds that when medical personnel know what kind of care a patient wants at the end of life, Medicare can be spared significant sums and the patient is more likely to die at home rather than in a hospital, at least in certain areas.
The study, published in the October 5, 2011, issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association, found that in regions of the U.S. that tend to spend the most on end-of-life care, patients who have “advance directives” cost Medicare about $5,600 less per person. (Advance directives allow patients to communicate their end-of-life wishes if they are unable to do so themselves.) These patients’ quality of life also appeared to be better; they were more likely to receive hospice care and to be at home when they died.
But the differences in spending and care did not hold up in regions of the country with low- to average end-of-life expenditures. The researchers speculated that in these areas, less aggressive care at the end of life is already the norm and more in line with what many patients want. In high-spending regions, by contrast, an advance directive may embolden caregivers to go against the local norm of aggressive treatment and prolonged hospital care. In 2006, treatment during the last year of life accounted for more than one-quarter of Medicare expenditures.
Advance directives typically include a “living will” that gives instructions regarding treatment if the individual becomes terminally ill or is in a persistent vegetative state. It may contain directions to refuse or remove life support in the event the individual is in a coma or a vegetative state, or it may provide instructions to use all efforts to keep the person alive, no matter the circumstances. Most participants in the study who had advance directives specified that they wanted to limit treatment.
“[The study] absolutely highlights some of the reasons why you should both talk to family, friends and physicians about the type of care you might want to receive, should you be unable to make your own decisions,” said Lauren Hersch Nicholas, the study’s lead author and a health economist at the University of Michigan.
Second Study: Aggressive Treatment Doesn’t Prolong Life
A related study just published in the medical journal The Lancet has found that nearly one of every three Medicare beneficiaries had an operation in their last year of life.
Operations were more likely in regions with a greater availability of hospital beds and higher levels of Medicare spending. But the higher rates of surgery didn’t necessarily pay off. The regions where doctors were more likely to operate had higher patient death rates.
“This level of surgical intensity doesn’t seem to be having much in the way of benefit for the population,” Dr. Ashish Jha, the study’s author and an associate professor of health policy at the Harvard School of Public Health, told ABC News. “Our sense is that there are probably lots of unnecessary procedures that go on at end of life.”
Each state has its own laws on advance directives. Caring Connections, a site run by the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization, offers state-by-state information on advance directives
Advance medical directives are an integral part of the estate planning services provided by elder law attorneys. To speak with a qualified elder law attorney and for more on health care decision-making, contact elderlaw attorney Jill E. Sugarman at 401-421-5115 ext. 215 or by e-mail at JSugarman@McLaughlinQuinn.com.
Tags: advance directives, asset protection, Asset Protection Planning, assisted living facilities, elder law, elderlaw, Elderlaw/Law For Life, end-of-life, Estate Planning, Hospice, Jill E. Sugarman, Jill Sugarman, living will, Long-term care, long-term care insurance, Medicaid, Medicaid planning, Medicare, nurses, Providence, Rhode Island, seniors, veterans
Posted in Asset Protection Planning, Elderlaw/Law For Life, Estate Planning
Wednesday, September 21st, 2011 by Moore McLaughlin
Around this time of year, unscrupulous companies step up their efforts to market costly living trusts to older Americans — arrangements that may actually undermine the buyer’s economic security.
According to the AARP, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and a number of state attorneys general, these high-pressure con artists have built an industry around older people’s fears that their estates could be eaten up by probate costs or taxes, or that the distribution of their assets could be delayed for years. The solution, they claim, is a living trust.
“What these fast-talking crooks don’t tell their clients,” AARP Volunteer Consumer Affairs Specialist Irma Swantner says, “is that the “living trust” they’re selling could become the buyer’s “living hell.”
The living trust is an estate planning device that eliminates the need for probate of the individual’s estate at his death. Assets are held in the trust and then distributed outside of probate at the time of death.
There is nothing wrong with a living trust or with trying to avoid probate. Attorneys may recommend a living trust as an estate planning device for some of their clients where it is appropriate for their particular needs. However, salespeople masquerading as professional estate planners are working the provinces trying to convince older Americans that such trusts are for everyone. Going door-to-door or using phone solicitation, they often greatly exaggerate the costs and delays of probate and are unlikely to mention that the vast majority of estates are not subject to federal or state estate taxes. Their products are “cookie-cutter” living trusts, sometimes in the form of living trust kits.
The problem is that many people don’t need a living trust, a trust from a kit may not meet a particular client’s needs, and often these companies charge more than the service is worth. In addition, according to the FTC, some companies are using the living trust concept merely as a way to gain access to consumers’ financial information and sell them other financial products, such as insurance annuities.
Among the dangers of “one-size-fits-all” living trusts, say AARP officials, is that in many cases they won’t make the grantor and spouse eligible for Medicaid reimbursement of nursing home costs. In addition some trusts improperly instruct the trustee to distribute property to beneficiaries immediately upon the death of the grantor. If creditors make a claim against the trust after asset distribution, the trustee becomes personally liable for any valid claims against the trust.
According to an AARP study published in 2000, about four million people older than 50 with less than $25,000 in annual income may have purchased costly, unnecessary, and potentially dangerous living trusts as a result of high-pressure sales tactics by firms masquerading as AARP affiliates. In fact, AARP is not associated with and does not endorse any company that markets or sells living trusts.
The Federal Trade Commission also reminds consumers of the “Cooling-Off Rule,” which provides that if you buy a living trust in your home or somewhere other than the seller’s permanent place of business (say, at a hotel seminar), the seller must give you a written statement of your right to cancel the deal within three business days.
To help older adults and families make better decisions about annuities, the Healthcare and Elder Law Programs Corporation (H.E.L.P.) has created a Web site, annuitytruth.org.
Or, better yet, seek the advice of a qualified elder law attorney, such as Jill E. Sugarman, before signing anything. You can contact Jill at 401-421-5115 ext. 215 or by e-mail at JSugarman@McLaughlinQuinn.com.
Tags: AARP, annuities, asset protection, Asset Protection Planning, assisted living facilities, elder law, elderlaw, Elderlaw/Law For Life, Estate Planning, Jill E. Sugarman, Jill Sugarman, living trust, living trusts, Long-term care, long-term care insurance, Massachusetts, mclaughlin & quinn, Medicaid, Medicaid planning, nursing homes, Providence, Rhode Island, seniors, veterans
Posted in Asset Protection Planning, Elderlaw/Law For Life, Estate Planning, Tax planning
Tuesday, September 13th, 2011 by Moore McLaughlin
Estate planning attorney Jill E. Sugarman reminds us that once you’ve taken the step to create a will and get your estate plan in order, you need to figure out what to do with the will itself. It is important to keep track of the location of your current will as well as any old wills.
Where to keep a will
The safest place to keep the original copy of your will is in a bank safe deposit box, but it may not always be the most practical. If the will is in a safe deposit box, it may be difficult for your family to access the box after you die. A better option may be to keep it at home in a fire-proof safe. Just make sure your family members know how to open the safe.
Some attorneys may keep the original copy of the will. But if you leave the will with your attorney, make sure the attorney receives updated contact information from you when you move. That way if the attorney moves offices or retires, he or she will know where to find you and you will know where your will is.
If you do use a safe deposit box or your attorney’s office, you may want to keep a copy of your will at home with your other financial documents. It is usually not a good idea to give a copy to family members or friends because you may want to change the distributions at some point and may need the will back.
What do you do with an old will?
Once you have written a new will, your inclination may be to destroy the old will, but this may not be a good idea. If, for some reason, your new will is invalidated, the court may be willing to reinstate an old will rather than allowing your estate to pass intestate (according to state law). It is likely that your old will adheres more closely to your wishes than an intestate distribution. If the will is destroyed, it cannot be reinstated.
On the other hand, if you have made a major change in your will, by all means destroy the old one. Otherwise, someone who did better under the old will may argue that you were incompetent or under undue influence when you executed the new will. Also, their feelings may be hurt if they see a change in your sentiments towards them.
Making changes to a will
If you want to make changes to a will, do not mark up the will by hand, even if you have only small changes to make. A court could take a marked-up will as a sign that you intended to revoke the will. If you want to make a change, contact an attorney who can draft an amendment to the will (called a codicil).
For more information on estate planning, contact estate planning and elderlaw attorney Jill E. Sugarman at 401-421-5115 ext. 215 or by e-mail at JSugarman@McLaughlinQuinn.com.
Tags: asset protection, Asset Protection Planning, assisted living facilities, elder law, elderlaw, Elderlaw/Law For Life, Estate Planning, Jill E. Sugarman, Jill Sugarman, Medicaid, Medicaid planning, Moore McLaughlin, nursing homes, Providence, Rhode Island, seniors, Tax planning, will, wills
Posted in Asset Protection Planning, Elderlaw/Law For Life, Estate Planning, Tax planning
