Posts Tagged ‘Deval Patrick’

Massachusetts Enacts 2012 Budget Act

Wednesday, July 13th, 2011 by Moore McLaughlin

On July 11, 2011, Governor Deval Patrick signed the 2012 budget act, which postpones the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 109 (FAS 109) deduction allowed certain corporations by a year, shortens the tax audit process, allows a deduction related to human organ donation, provides for recalculation of the dairy tax credit or trigger price in certain circumstances, and establishes a life sciences tax incentive program. It also provides certain sales tax exemption and revises certain administrative provisions.

Income tax. Life sciences tax incentive program: Effective as of January 1, 2009, a life sciences tax incentive program is established. The Life Sciences Center, in consultation with the Department of Revenue may authorize incentives not exceeding $25 million annually. Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2012, a taxpayer who commits to the creation of a minimum of 50 net new permanent full-time positions in Massachusetts is allowed, to the extent authorized by the life sciences tax incentive program, a refundable jobs credit against personal and corporate income taxes.

FAS 109 deduction: The implementation of the deduction allowed to limit the impact of combined reporting on the financial statements of some publicly traded corporation is delayed to 2013. The deduction was to be prorated over the 7-year period beginning with the combined group’s taxable year that begins 2012.

Organ donation related expenses: Effective for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2012, a resident individual who donates an organ to another person for human organ transplantation may claim a deduction in an amount equal to the travel expenses, lodging expenses and lost wages not to exceed $10,000 that the individual incurred in donating his or her organ. Human organ means all or part of human bone marrow, liver, pancreas, kidney, intestine or lung.

Daily farmer tax credit program: Effective July 1, 2011, the law requires that the regulations for the implementation, administration, and enforcement of the daily farmer tax credit program must provide that when the board of food and agriculture determines that an error has been made in calculating the trigger price or in reporting or collecting data used in the calculation of the trigger price or the tax credit, the Commissioner must recalculate said trigger price or tax credit.

Sales tax. Effective July 1, 2011, a sales tax exemption is provided for sales of physician-prescribed, medically necessary breast pumps.

Property tax. A person required to file a true list of taxable personal property may not be prevented from inspecting or receiving a copy of his or her submission.

Cigarette tax. Applicable to stamps purchased on or after January 1, 2012, a higher amount that a stamper may withhold as compensation in case of encrypted stamps purchased is provided. A stamper who has complied with cigarette tax law may withhold from each payment to be made by that stamper for such stamps as compensation the following amounts: (1) for encrypted stamps purchased and not returned for an abatement, $12 per roll of 1,200 stamps; and (2) in each fiscal year, $600 per roll of 30,000 encrypted stamps for the first 50 rolls purchased and $200 per each additional roll of 30,000 encrypted stamps purchased. Current law only provides for non-encrypted stamps purchases, which is $1.85 for each 600 stamps purchased.

Administrative provisions. Interests on deficiency assessments: Applicable to interest accruing on deficiency assessments where the audit resulting in the deficiency assessment commences after July 1, 2011, the tax audit cycle is shortened by reducing some interest penalties charged businesses if the Department takes more than 18 months to perform an audit provided the taxpayer meets certain conditions.

Abatement and assessment periods: Applicable to requests for refund or applications for abatement filed with the Commissioner on or after July 1, 2011, the statutes of limitations for assessment and abatements are revised. However, the change will not apply with respect to tax periods where the statute of limitations for refund or abatement, as applicable, had expired prior to July 1, 2011.

A request for a refund or credit of an overpayment of any tax where a required return has not been timely filed must be made by filing the overdue return within three years from the due date of the return, taking into account any extension of time for filing the return, or within two years of the date that the tax was paid, whichever is later. A request for a refund or credit of an overpayment of any tax where no return is required must be made by the taxpayer within two years from the time the tax was paid. A request for a refund or credit of an overpayment of tax where the required return was timely filed must be made within the period permitted for abatement for that return. Where a refund or credit results from an abatement, the amount of the refund or credit must be limited to the amount paid or deemed paid within three years of the date that the application for abatement is filed, taking into account any extension of time for filing the return. Previously, a request for a refund or credit of an overpayment of any tax where a required return has not been timely filed must be made by filing the overdue return within three years from the due date of the return, without regard to extension of time for filing the return, or within two years of the date that the tax was paid, whichever is later.

Any person aggrieved by the assessment of a tax, other than taxes assessed under the laws on taxation of legacies and successions or on taxation or transfers of certain estates, may apply in writing to the Commissioner for an abatement at any time within three years from the date of filing the return, within two years from the date the tax was assessed or deemed to be assessed or within one year from the date that the tax was paid, whichever is later.

Massachusetts Enacts 2011 Budget Act

Tuesday, July 6th, 2010 by Moore McLaughlin
Massachusetts

Massachusetts

On June 30, 2010, Governor Deval Patrick signed the 2011 budget act (H4800), which includes credit transparency provisions, extends the historic rehabilitation tax credit, and provides administrative provisions to facilitate collection. The bill takes effect July 1, 2010, unless otherwise stated.

Credit transparency. Effective January 1, 2011, the head of the administrative agency of each tax credit program must submit, on or before May 15 each year, a report to the Commissioner on each tax credit program authorized for the previous calendar year. Tax credits required to be disclosed include the historic preservation tax credit, dairy farm tax credit, USFDA user fees credit, film tax credit, life sciences investment tax credit, low-income housing tax credit, medical device tax credit, refundable research credit, credit under the economic development incentive program, and any transferable or refundable credits under the corporate and personal income tax laws established after January 1, 2011. The report will contain: (1) the identity of each taxpayer receiving an authorized tax credit and from which tax credit program the credit was received; (2) the amount of the authorized tax credit awarded and issued for each taxpayer and each project, if applicable; and (3) the date that the authorized tax credit was awarded and issued for each taxpayer and each project. The report will be a public record. The report will cover only credits awarded or claimed after January 1, 2011. For purposes of the report, the taxpayer is the initial recipient of an authorized tax credit.

Historic rehabilitation tax credit. The historic rehabilitation tax credit is extended for a 12-year period up to December 31, 2017. Under current law the Commissioner, in consultation with the Massachusetts Historical Commission, is authorize to annually grant a historic rehabilitation tax credit in an amount not to exceed $50 million per year to qualified taxpayers for the 6-year period beginning January 1, 2006, and ending December 31, 2011.

Determination of partner’s distributive share. The budget act also includes a provision clarifying how a partner’s distributive share of an item of income, loss, deduction or credit from a partnership is determined. It provides that a partner’s distributive share is determined in accordance with the partner’s interest in the partnership, determined by taking into account all facts and circumstances, such as, if the allocation to a partner under the agreement of income, gain, loss, deduction or credit had no substantial economic effect or the partnership agreement does not provide as to the partnership’s distributive share of income, gain, loss, deduction or credit. It also provides that the determination of a partner’s distributive share must take into account rules and principles developed under the Internal Revenue Code and any regulations promulgated thereunder, and adjusted as required or appropriate to properly reflect income and other tax items for Massachusetts tax purposes.

Pass-through entity provision. The budget act includes provisions involving unified audit procedures for pass-through entities. It requires members or indirect owners of a pass-through entity to report items of income, expense or credit derived from the pass-through entity in a manner consistent with reporting of the pass-through entity, except to the extent that a taxpayer, member or indirect owner makes a declaration of inconsistency with its original return. The Commissioner is mandated to establish by regulation unified audit procedures.

Penalty provisions. The budget act amends the additional tax liability provision in cases when the federal government determines a difference from the amount previously reported in the taxable income of a person or the federal credit to which such person may be entitled or in cases when the tax due any other state, U.S. territory or the Dominion of Canada or any of its provinces, on account of any item of Massachusetts gross income of a Massachusetts resident, is finally determined by that jurisdiction to be less than the tax previously reported, and such tax was the basis for a credit claimed by the Massachusetts resident. It provides that failure to report such difference under both circumstances is subject to a penalty of 10% of the additional tax found due. Prior law provided that the penalty is $100 or 10% of the additional tax found due, whichever sum is smaller. A new provision provides that a person who fails to pay to the Commissioner any cigarette excise required to be paid will be personally and individually liable. “Person” includes, but not limited to, an officer or employee of a corporation or a member or employee of a partnership or limited liability company who, as such officer, employee or member, is under a duty to pay over the cigarette excise tax.

Installment and deferred payment sales. The budget act also provides a new provision requiring interest to be paid on some deferred tax liabilities generated from the use of installment sales applicable for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2010 with respect to installment obligations as of the close of the tax year.

Sales tax provision. The budget act repeals the sales tax provision making it unlawful for any vendor to advertise or hold out or state to the public or any customer that the vendor will assume or absorb the tax or that it will not be added to the selling price of the property or services sold or, if added, it will be refunded.

For more information on these new provisions, contact tax attorney and CPA Moore McLaughlin at MMcLaughlin@McLaughlinQuinn.com or by phone at 401-421-5115 ext. 212.

Masssachusetts increases audits of small businesses

Tuesday, May 26th, 2009 by Moore McLaughlin

According to a recent report in the Boston Business Journal, the 87 new auditors and tax collectors hired by the Massachusetts Department of Revenue last year have paid tremendous dividends to the Commonwealth’s coffers.  According to this report by Lisa Van Der Pool, the Massachusetts Department of Revenue invested about $6 million last year and collected about $72 million in additional taxes.  Nice return on investment.  This article also reports that, according to the Department of Revenue, Gov. Deval Patrick has proposed that the DOR take on 14 more collectors.  Click here for the full article.boston_business_journal

As more states struggle with budgetary and other fiscal constraints, expect to see more efforts to audit and collect taxes under the current system.  Our attorneys at McLaughlin & Quinn, LLC have already felt this renewed effort in both Massachusetts and Rhode Island.  The numbers of new cases is at an all-time high.  These state efforts are focused not just on personal and corporate income taxes, but sales and use taxes, payroll taxes, and excise taxes, such as the cigarette tax, fuels taxes and others.

Ms. Van Der Pool’s article correctly points out that everyone should pay their taxes according to the law.  But, as a tax attorney I can attest that there can certainly be differing opinions as to the proper interpretation of the law.  However, merely not paying any taxes, or not filing tax returns, is not the appropriate method to challenge an interpretation of the tax law.

If you have been selected for audit, if you know you owe taxes, or if you have not filed all required tax returns, and if you want to get these matters settled and behind you, you need to seek competant tax advice immediately.